000			02085nmm a22003017a 4500
003			SPU
005			20240302145248.0
008			240302s2023||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d
020			_a9781009319782
040			_aSPU
049			_amain
050		4	_aHC 59.3 _bT53G 2023
100			_aTienhaara, Kyla Susanne, _d1978- _9256721
245	1	2	_aA green and just recovery from COVID-19? : _bgovernment investment in the energy transition during the pandemic / _cKyla Tienhaara [and nine others]
260			_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press, _c2023
300			_aonline resource
449			_a110241
505			_aLiterature Review -- Energy Policies during the Pandemic -- Conclusions
506			_aAvailable to OhioLINK libraries
520			_aStimulus spending to address the economic crisis brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic has the potential to either facilitate the transition away from fossil energy or to lock in carbon-intensive technologies and infrastructure for decades to come. Whether they are focused on green sectors or not, stimulus measures can alleviate or reinforce socio-economic inequality. This Element delves into the data in the Energy Policy Tracker to assess the extent to which energy policies adopted during the pandemic will expedite decarbonization and explores whether governments address inequities through policies targeted to disadvantaged, marginalized and underserved individuals and communities. The overall finding is that the recovery has not been sufficiently green or just. Nevertheless, a small number of policies aim to advance distributive justice and provide potential models for policymakers as they continue to attempt to 'build back better'. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core
650		0	_aCOVID-19 PANDEMIC, 2020- _xECONOMIC ASPECTS _9256722
650		0	_aENERGY TRANSITION _xGOVERNMENT POLICY _9256723
850			_aSPU
856			_uhttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781009319782
910			_aLibrary _bCambridge University Press _c020324 _pEB000430
942			_2lcc _cEBK
998			_ajirawan 0324
999			_c213630